Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds

Published 13 May 2020

This page has been archived.
It has been replaced by School results for 10 to 11 year olds.

Contents

1. Main facts and figures

• 79% of 10 to 11 year olds met the expected standard in maths in the 2018 to 2019 school year

• 27% of pupils met the higher standard

• pupils from the Chinese ethnic group were the most likely out of all ethnic groups to meet the expected and higher standards

• White Gypsy and Roma pupils were least likely out of all ethnic groups to meet both the expected and higher standards

• pupils from the Chinese ethnic group made the most progress between 7 and 11 years old

• in every ethnic group except White Irish, girls were more likely than boys to meet the expected standard

• in every ethnic group except Black Caribbean, boys were more likely than girls to meet the higher standard

• Black Caribbean and White Irish Traveller pupils made the least progress between 7 and 11 years old

• boys from the Chinese ethnic group had the highest average scaled score, at 112 compared with an average of 105

Things you need to know

In the 2018 to 2019 school year, 644,723 pupils were assessed for maths in key stage 2 at state-funded schools.

Ethnicity was known for 99% of pupils. Of those:

• 74% of pupils were White
• 11% were Asian
• 6% had Mixed ethnicity
• 6% were Black
• 0.4% were Chinese
• 2% were from Other ethnic groups

Numbers of pupils vary in the results for different subjects. This is because pupils who don’t have a valid result for a particular subject are excluded from the total. For more about valid results, see the Methodology.

There were 2,320 White Gypsy and Roma pupils and 473 Traveller of Irish Heritage pupils.

The Isles of Scilly had 19 pupils and the City of London had 28. Use caution when interpreting figures for these groups and local authorities as they are based on small numbers of pupils.

What the data measures

The data measures the maths attainment of pupils at the end of key stage 2 (year 6), when children are usually 10 or 11 years old.

The data covers the 2018 to 2019 school year. The download file also provides attainment for pupils who were eligible for free school meals and those who were not eligible.

Teachers assess each pupil against the following standards:

• expected standard – pupils must have a ‘scaled score’ of 100 or more
• higher standard – pupils must have a ‘scaled score’ of 110 or more

For each ethnic group, there are also figures for:

• average scaled score
• progress score

Scaled scores range from 80 to 120. They allow for variations in test difficulty year on year and help give a clearer comparison between years.

Read more about scaled scores at key stage 2.

The progress score measures the progress that pupils make between the end of key stage 1 (primary school year 2) and the end of key stage 2 (year 6). A pupil’s results are compared with the actual achievements of other pupils nationally with similar key stage 1 results.

This data shows an average progress score for each ethnic group.

A progress score of 0 (the national average) means pupils are making the expected amount of progress.

A positive score (0.1 and above) means they are making more progress than expected.

A negative score (-0.1 and below) means they are making less progress than expected.

The ethnic categories used in this data

This data uses categories from the Department for Education’s school census. These groupings are based on the 2001 national Census, with 2 exceptions:

• White Irish Traveller and White Gypsy and Roma children have been separated into 2 categories
• pupils in the Chinese ethnic group are in a separate category from Asian pupils

These changes were made after consultations with local authorities and lobby groups.

Local authority data is only provided for 6 ethnic groups:

• Asian
• Black
• Chinese
• Mixed
• White
• Other

2. By ethnicity

• Location: England
• Time period: 2018 to 2019 school year
• Source: National curriculum assessments: key stage 2, 2019 (revised)

Percentage of pupils meeting the expected and higher standards in maths, and average scaled score and progress score, by ethnicity

Ethnicity	Expected standard	Higher standard	Average scaled score	Progress score
All	79	27	105	0.0
Asian	84	36	107	1.8
Bangladeshi	84	35	107	1.9
Indian	89	48	109	2.5
Pakistani	79	27	105	1.1
Asian other	87	43	108	2.6
Black	78	25	105	0.3
Black African	81	28	106	0.9
Black Caribbean	70	15	103	-1.4
Black other	74	22	104	0.0
Chinese	94	64	111	4.4
Mixed	79	28	105	-0.1
Mixed White/Asian	84	36	107	0.7
Mixed White/Black African	78	25	105	-0.2
Mixed White/Black Caribbean	72	18	103	-1.3
Mixed other	80	30	106	0.4
White	78	25	105	-0.3
White British	78	25	105	-0.5
White Irish	82	34	106	0.6
Gypsy/Roma	34	4	96	-0.8
Irish Traveller	40	5	98	-1.4
White other	80	30	106	2.2
Other	79	31	106	2.4
Unknown	62	20	104	-0.4

Download table data (CSV) Source data (CSV)

Summary of Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds By ethnicity Summary

The data shows that:

• 79% of pupils met the expected standard in maths in year 6 (when they were 10 or 11 years old)
• 27% met the higher standard
• 94% of pupils from the Chinese ethnic group met the expected standard and 64% met the higher standard, the highest percentages out of all ethnic groups
• 34% of pupils from the White Gypsy and Roma ethnic group met the expected standard and 4% met the higher standard, the lowest percentages out of all ethnic groups
• pupils from the Chinese ethnic group had the highest average scaled score (111) compared with the national average (105)
• White Gypsy and Roma pupils had the lowest average scaled score (96)
• pupils from the Chinese ethnic group made the most progress with a score of 4.4 (compared with the national average of 0.0)
• pupils from the Black Caribbean and White Irish Traveller ethnic groups made the least progress with scores of -1.4

3. By ethnicity and gender

• Location: England
• Time period: 2018 to 2019 school year
• Source: National curriculum assessments: key stage 2, 2019 (revised)

Percentage of pupils meeting the expected and higher standards in maths, and average scaled score and progress score, by ethnicity and gender

	Boys				Girls
Ethnicity	Boys Expected standard	Boys Higher standard	Boys Average scaled score	Boys Progress score	Girls Expected standard	Girls Higher standard	Girls Average scaled score	Girls Progress score
All	78	29	105	0.7	79	24	105	-0.7
Asian	84	39	107	2.6	84	34	106	1.1
Bangladeshi	83	37	107	2.7	85	32	106	1.1
Indian	89	51	109	3.2	90	45	108	1.8
Pakistani	79	29	105	1.9	79	24	105	0.2
Asian other	87	45	108	3.3	87	40	107	1.9
Black	76	25	105	0.7	80	24	105	-0.1
Black African	79	28	106	1.3	83	27	105	0.4
Black Caribbean	67	15	102	-1.1	73	16	103	-1.6
Black other	71	23	104	0.3	78	21	104	-0.4
Chinese	93	68	112	5.1	95	60	111	3.7
Mixed	78	29	105	0.5	80	26	105	-0.7
Mixed White/Asian	84	39	107	1.4	85	34	106	0.0
Mixed White/Black African	76	26	105	0.3	80	24	105	-0.8
Mixed White/Black Caribbean	70	19	103	-0.8	74	16	103	-1.8
Mixed other	80	32	106	1.0	81	28	105	-0.2
White	78	28	105	0.4	79	22	104	-1.1
White British	78	27	105	0.2	79	22	104	-1.3
White Irish	82	36	107	1.3	81	31	106	-0.2
Gypsy/Roma	33	5	97	0.0	35	4	96	-1.5
Irish Traveller	39	6	98	-1.0	41	3	98	-1.7
White other	79	33	106	3.0	80	27	105	1.4
Other	78	34	106	3.1	79	28	105	1.6
Unknown	61	21	104	0.2	63	19	103	-1.1

Download table data (CSV) Source data (CSV)

Summary of Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds By ethnicity and gender Summary

The data shows that:

• 79% of girls and 78% of boys met the expected standard in maths in year 6 (when they were 10 or 11 years old)

• 29% of boys and 24% of girls met the higher standard

• in every ethnic group except White Irish, girls were more likely than boys to meet the expected standard

• in every ethnic group except Black Caribbean, boys were more likely than girls to meet the higher standard

• girls from the Chinese ethnic group were the most likely to meet the expected standard (95%)

• boys from the Chinese ethnic group were most likely to meet the higher standard (68%)

• boys from the White Gypsy and Roma ethnic group were least likely to meet the expected standard (33%)

• girls from the White Irish Traveller ethnic group were least likely to meet the higher standard (3%)

• the smallest gap between boys (82%) and girls (81%) meeting the expected standard was in the White Irish ethnic group

• the biggest gap between girls and boys meeting the expected standard was in the Black Other (78% compared with 71%) and the Black Caribbean (73% compared with 67%) ethnic groups

• boys from the Chinese ethnic group had the highest average scaled score (112)

• girls from the White Gypsy and Roma ethnic group had the lowest average scaled score (96)

• boys from the Chinese ethnic group had the highest average progress score (5.1)

• girls from the Mixed White and Black Caribbean ethnic groups had the lowest average progress score (-1.8)

4. By ethnicity and area

• Location: England
• Time period: 2018 to 2019 school year
• Source: National curriculum assessments: key stage 2, 2019 (revised)

Percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in maths, by ethnicity and area

	All		Asian		Black		Chinese		Mixed		White		Other
Local authority	All %	All Pupils	Asian %	Asian Pupils	Black %	Black Pupils	Chinese %	Chinese Pupils	Mixed %	Mixed Pupils	White %	White Pupils	Other %	Other Pupils
Barking and Dagenham	80	2,813	88	673	82	892	100	10	75	232	76	962	65	31
Barnet	86	3,613	90	421	81	401	100	55	85	364	87	1,929	86	397
Barnsley	81	2,285	96	24	82	18	100	2	76	54	81	2,159	100	10
Bath and North East Somerset	80	1,444	93	26	64	7	80	4	74	70	80	1,319	67	6
Bedford	71	1,533	71	232	73	91	83	5	63	161	72	1,018	64	18
Bexley	81	2,729	93	252	86	519	98	55	82	192	78	1,650	73	43
Birmingham	77	12,487	79	4,820	76	1,604	94	82	73	1,016	75	4,139	79	674
Blackburn with Darwen	82	1,793	83	820	88	29	100	5	82	59	80	854	100	21
Blackpool	82	1,378	91	32	60	3	75	3	75	45	83	1,288	75	6
Bolton	79	3,124	80	779	67	167	100	6	81	126	80	1,981	70	52
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole	81	3,120	95	125	81	13	93	13	84	190	81	2,722	78	31
Bracknell Forest	79	1,123	87	68	79	38	90	9	84	85	78	911	86	6
Bradford	78	6,150	82	2,771	79	103	100	7	76	310	74	2,852	76	77
Brent	84	3,070	87	963	80	705	100	9	83	236	85	785	82	353
Brighton and Hove	79	2,124	84	71	79	46	89	17	84	237	78	1,669	82	46
Bristol, City of	78	3,786	78	303	72	393	100	23	72	318	80	2,698	65	32
Bromley	85	3,189	95	203	81	298	100	28	84	344	85	2,211	81	55
Buckinghamshire	79	4,926	81	849	69	115	96	24	78	381	78	3,482	83	35
Bury	80	1,900	79	286	71	41	83	10	76	88	81	1,444	77	24
Calderdale	79	2,169	81	391	64	16	100	9	81	89	79	1,646	73	11
Cambridgeshire	77	5,372	86	255	69	59	96	45	77	291	76	4,611	85	52
Camden	86	1,320	85	294	87	253	94	16	86	146	86	527	83	67
Central Bedfordshire	77	2,672	89	66	83	74	100	4	75	194	76	2,300	78	14
Cheshire East	80	3,387	84	72	81	13	93	13	79	139	80	3,128	63	12
Cheshire West and Chester	78	3,111	85	51	58	11	88	15	80	85	78	2,919	81	17
City of London	96	27	100	11	100	2	N/A*	N/A*	100	4	100	9	50	1
Cornwall	76	4,435	80	12	33	1	89	8	74	106	76	4,240	86	19
County Durham	80	4,564	88	30	89	8	89	16	88	88	79	4,397	79	15
Coventry	77	3,400	81	774	77	411	90	19	75	220	76	1,901	68	48
Croydon	79	3,687	90	655	76	1,004	94	30	74	543	80	1,360	80	55
Cumbria	78	4,076	80	35	56	5	88	7	82	63	78	3,905	79	15
Darlington	83	1,056	90	28	86	6	100	1	73	22	82	981	82	9
Derby	76	2,515	83	518	75	97	100	10	77	191	74	1,619	76	56
Derbyshire	79	6,918	91	96	75	18	94	31	82	215	79	6,483	91	20
Devon	77	6,113	94	58	91	10	96	22	79	153	77	5,788	74	39
Doncaster	78	2,911	84	92	84	46	86	18	73	80	77	2,647	77	17
Dorset	76	2,963	89	24	67	8	100	12	76	93	76	2,810	67	2
Dudley	74	2,861	79	323	64	60	71	10	67	174	74	2,229	66	54
Ealing	85	3,671	87	1,094	78	538	100	18	83	299	86	1,127	84	558
East Riding of Yorkshire	79	2,877	94	16	71	5	50	1	81	63	79	2,757	89	16
East Sussex	75	4,144	82	94	83	34	93	13	77	246	75	3,696	53	17
Enfield	81	3,753	91	351	79	917	97	28	84	405	79	1,785	86	213
Essex	80	13,248	94	424	85	443	100	54	83	750	79	11,330	86	113
Gateshead	82	1,716	83	38	89	33	100	9	84	32	81	1,567	79	26
Gloucestershire	78	5,345	86	176	70	78	94	16	79	267	78	4,734	73	16
Greenwich	85	2,855	92	259	87	1,064	92	44	86	294	80	1,115	88	71
Hackney	78	2,026	81	252	75	705	100	11	78	208	79	711	83	127
Halton	75	1,208	86	6	100	1	N/A*	N/A*	73	24	75	1,164	20	1
Hammersmith and Fulham	83	1,102	86	69	78	289	100	3	77	142	89	451	85	127
Hampshire	80	11,917	88	422	87	161	91	48	85	495	80	10,663	83	80
Haringey	80	2,444	87	163	75	601	93	28	80	274	82	1,227	72	135
Harrow	86	2,528	90	1,257	79	223	100	8	77	197	86	708	83	101
Hartlepool	82	956	79	19	100	3	100	9	87	13	81	907	40	2
Havering	84	2,543	92	225	85	309	89	8	84	176	83	1,779	85	17
Herefordshire, County of	81	1,515	90	9	86	6	100	3	83	50	80	1,435	86	6
Hertfordshire	80	11,398	86	1,051	76	498	91	62	79	802	79	8,775	81	137
Hillingdon	83	3,234	89	963	78	345	100	6	82	381	80	1,220	84	272
Hounslow	83	2,766	90	972	79	312	94	17	81	236	79	875	86	321
Isle of Wight	74	952	70	7	67	2	100	5	78	39	74	893	100	1
Isles of Scilly	47	9	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	N/A*	44	8	N/A*	N/A*
Islington	80	1,532	84	127	76	370	100	10	79	240	82	686	85	83
Kensington and Chelsea	87	829	88	37	85	156	100	3	89	167	88	304	88	144
Kent	79	14,093	91	663	85	449	96	49	80	787	78	11,895	86	136
Kingston upon Hull, City of	80	2,567	98	52	78	51	100	5	81	95	80	2,295	85	63
Kingston upon Thames	84	1,590	90	299	81	29	100	30	84	179	81	919	89	116
Kirklees	78	4,339	78	1,182	72	74	94	15	78	288	78	2,721	70	35
Knowsley	78	1,411	89	34	92	11	50	1	67	26	78	1,326	67	6
Lambeth	84	2,539	93	146	81	1,086	94	16	84	353	85	785	88	134
Lancashire	78	11,051	78	1,246	77	44	95	39	78	375	79	9,250	80	51
Leeds	77	7,166	77	858	72	552	90	47	74	467	78	5,062	74	136
Leicester	80	3,804	86	1,741	81	387	100	17	76	253	74	1,280	84	90
Leicestershire	81	6,173	89	510	82	75	96	27	82	310	80	5,187	83	25
Lewisham	81	2,818	96	196	78	1,065	94	44	80	446	83	933	83	93
Lincolnshire	75	6,201	91	79	79	33	84	21	80	200	74	5,784	83	30
Liverpool	77	3,996	84	198	78	193	95	75	78	231	76	3,132	75	158
Luton	76	2,482	76	1,166	75	259	100	10	80	223	75	761	83	43
Manchester	78	5,239	82	1,257	79	952	92	59	77	438	75	2,116	77	381
Medway	77	2,608	90	167	83	202	86	6	81	183	75	2,003	82	28
Merton	83	1,912	91	449	73	252	93	14	76	174	83	944	92	66
Middlesbrough	79	1,450	82	162	83	15	N/A*	N/A*	71	80	79	1,148	83	39
Milton Keynes	81	3,031	91	446	79	423	88	23	81	253	79	1,794	93	28
Newcastle upon Tyne	81	2,393	88	358	81	153	97	35	82	111	79	1,659	81	65
Newham	87	4,139	90	1,938	85	949	100	20	83	259	84	700	86	243
Norfolk	75	6,878	90	128	74	61	95	36	76	244	74	6,288	80	63
North East Lincolnshire	81	1,551	94	17	71	5	100	1	90	52	81	1,448	90	19
North Lincolnshire	81	1,589	87	66	83	10	100	3	71	24	81	1,464	79	11
North Somerset	79	1,902	94	31	83	10	100	8	80	74	79	1,769	100	4
North Tyneside	80	1,952	86	50	63	12	94	16	87	66	79	1,794	88	7
North Yorkshire	77	4,861	86	72	55	17	100	10	75	129	77	4,579	68	17
Northamptonshire	75	7,131	83	370	78	412	97	32	71	368	75	5,851	69	48
Northumberland	79	2,826	89	51	40	2	100	7	83	55	79	2,692	83	10
Nottingham	79	2,820	85	496	80	353	92	11	79	386	76	1,473	83	87
Nottinghamshire	79	7,344	86	247	75	83	92	24	80	335	79	6,551	76	45
Oldham	78	2,731	79	923	82	106	92	12	79	141	78	1,519	59	16
Oxfordshire	79	5,864	79	368	74	155	100	20	75	384	79	4,787	73	73
Peterborough	73	2,186	77	438	73	99	100	8	72	137	71	1,444	83	30
Plymouth	78	2,297	93	25	88	21	100	10	76	68	78	2,132	65	26
Portsmouth	75	1,657	83	99	71	54	89	8	92	110	73	1,335	74	32
Reading	78	1,478	87	331	74	141	100	11	75	163	76	783	96	23
Redbridge	85	3,453	89	1,934	75	352	100	21	82	251	81	803	83	45
Redcar and Cleveland	85	1,384	80	8	80	4	100	1	92	46	84	1,311	71	5
Richmond upon Thames	91	2,096	93	194	71	41	88	21	86	196	92	1,568	89	48
Rochdale	76	2,280	75	592	73	92	100	12	73	84	77	1,464	73	27
Rotherham	75	2,531	67	176	79	52	92	11	63	69	76	2,188	86	24
Rutland	80	318	100	5	67	4	N/A*	N/A*	92	11	81	294	50	2
Salford	79	2,368	87	89	84	144	100	1	80	193	79	1,847	76	75
Sandwell	78	3,701	85	1,189	72	352	92	22	74	326	75	1,701	83	95
Sefton	79	2,321	93	28	71	10	100	7	82	63	79	2,196	62	8
Sheffield	78	4,908	81	636	76	290	96	46	77	372	77	3,355	82	180
Shropshire	79	2,413	88	21	71	5	100	4	80	74	79	2,292	100	4
Slough	83	1,951	91	1,029	79	167	100	3	76	161	72	494	92	85
Solihull	83	2,174	89	306	91	52	97	29	77	171	81	1,560	91	29
Somerset	75	4,389	86	69	94	15	92	12	78	138	74	4,115	50	9
South Gloucestershire	79	2,619	88	92	78	35	91	10	85	145	79	2,306	73	19
South Tyneside	80	1,335	82	47	90	9	100	3	81	35	80	1,228	100	9
Southampton	78	2,185	80	297	77	69	100	16	80	141	77	1,613	85	44
Southend-on-Sea	80	1,766	92	130	83	53	100	23	77	113	79	1,414	81	13
Southwark	81	2,683	84	151	79	1,177	97	29	80	301	83	767	83	210
St. Helens	78	1,724	95	19	75	9	80	8	74	32	78	1,648	75	6
Staffordshire	79	7,725	81	361	66	51	95	35	73	257	79	6,943	78	36
Stockport	80	2,750	87	218	73	33	91	20	70	127	80	2,313	78	25
Stockton-on-Tees	83	2,069	85	116	85	23	100	7	87	58	82	1,850	86	6
Stoke-on-Trent	75	2,495	77	387	77	100	100	12	79	126	74	1,829	68	38
Suffolk	77	6,104	88	128	70	60	75	3	77	359	77	5,419	78	58
Sunderland	80	2,595	88	116	86	24	85	11	85	47	79	2,388	67	2
Surrey	83	10,255	87	758	80	185	97	68	82	643	82	8,392	86	114
Sutton	85	2,031	94	397	84	141	100	41	86	202	82	1,197	85	29
Swindon	77	2,238	83	285	81	74	93	14	75	135	76	1,692	67	16
Tameside	79	2,335	85	264	82	69	100	13	79	111	78	1,844	71	17
Telford and Wrekin	79	1,806	82	122	78	68	100	13	84	98	78	1,491	67	4
Thurrock	84	2,020	92	124	89	354	94	15	89	127	81	1,354	88	23
Torbay	79	1,142	96	24	100	1	75	3	76	32	79	1,068	64	7
Tower Hamlets	85	2,837	87	1,894	83	277	100	11	80	171	81	371	91	99
Trafford	87	2,621	92	410	80	109	98	61	87	201	86	1,740	91	74
Wakefield	78	3,137	77	127	80	45	95	21	73	90	78	2,834	65	17
Walsall	77	2,916	82	775	74	145	93	13	72	169	76	1,767	65	33
Waltham Forest	84	2,791	88	762	79	507	97	28	85	341	84	1,033	80	104
Wandsworth	83	1,981	87	385	75	417	100	10	77	230	86	841	85	76
Warrington	85	2,209	92	81	83	19	100	6	92	70	84	2,009	60	12
Warwickshire	78	4,992	88	337	77	61	95	21	81	256	77	4,254	87	26
West Berkshire	77	1,492	83	45	74	17	100	6	77	80	76	1,324	70	7
West Sussex	77	7,077	83	359	75	94	82	18	76	349	76	6,149	81	42
Westminster	84	1,197	81	155	82	210	100	12	84	125	85	317	85	366
Wigan	80	3,063	79	34	75	43	83	5	86	84	80	2,864	76	29
Wiltshire	76	4,103	94	62	67	60	94	15	84	158	76	3,741	77	37
Windsor and Maidenhead	79	1,257	80	203	45	10	100	6	78	107	80	898	71	15
Wirral	75	2,821	89	80	78	14	95	19	79	77	74	2,608	78	7
Wokingham	84	1,803	93	286	94	58	100	14	86	143	82	1,269	83	15
Wolverhampton	76	2,562	83	650	77	304	88	7	71	280	74	1,275	74	35
Worcestershire	77	4,733	80	202	83	24	100	10	79	190	77	4,252	79	19
York	82	1,624	93	38	86	6	100	4	79	48	82	1,506	100	11

^* Not applicable

Download table data (CSV) Source data (CSV)

Summary of Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds By ethnicity and area Summary

The data shows that:

• out of all local authorities, White pupils were most likely to meet the expected standard in Richmond upon Thames (92%) and least likely to in Peterborough (71%) – this doesn't include City of London and Isles of Scilly which only have one school each, and whose results should be treated with caution
• figures for other ethnic groups are based on small numbers of pupils, so reliable generalisations can't be made

5. Methodology

The key stage 2 datasets combine information from the following 2 data sources:

• key stage 1 results
• school census records

Key stage 2 data from the Standard Testing Agency is matched to school census records to identify pupils’ ethnicities and free school meal eligibility.

Only pupils with a valid outcome are included in the calculations for that subject.

Valid outcomes are:

• achieved the higher standard
• achieved the expected standard
• working towards the expected standard
• special consideration
• absent
• working below the standard of the test
• unable to access the test

Confidence intervals

Confidence intervals are calculated for a school based on a specific group of pupils. This is because:

• a school may perform differently with a different set of pupils
• some pupils may be more likely to achieve high or low results, independently of which school they attend

To account for this uncertainty, it is best to interpret these school scores alongside their associated confidence intervals. You can see these if you download the data.

How school scores are interpreted alongside their confidence intervals:

• if the lower confidence interval is greater than zero, the school has achieved greater than average progress compared to pupils with similar starting points nationally
• if the upper confidence interval is below zero, then the school has made less than average progress
• where the 95% confidence intervals overlap zero, this means that the school’s progress score is not significantly different from the national

Rounding

Percentages given in charts, tables and downloads are rounded to the nearest whole number. Progress scores are given to 1 decimal place.

Related publications

Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2019

Quality and methodology information

6. Data sources

Source

National curriculum assessments: key stage 2, 2019 (revised)

Type of data

Administrative data

Type of statistic

National Statistics

Publisher

Department for Education

Publication frequency

Yearly

Purpose of data source

The main purpose is to measure schools' and pupils' progress and performance from key stage 1 to key stage 2, in order to monitor and improve standards and inform parental choice when applying to local schools.

7. Download the data

Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds 2018 to 2019 National - Spreadsheet (csv) 126 KB

This file contains the following variables: Measure, Ethnicity, Ethnicity_type, Time, Time_type, Geography, Geography_type, Geography_code, Gender, Age, FSM, Value, Value_type, Denominator, Numerator

Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds 2018 to 2019 Progress - Spreadsheet (csv) 48 KB

This file contains the following variables: Measure, Ethnicity, Ethnicity_type, Time, Time_type, Geography, Geography_type, Geography_code, Gender, Age, FSM, Value, Value_type, Denominator, Numerator, Lower_95_CI, Upper_95_CI

Maths results for 10 to 11 year olds 2018 to 2019 LA - Spreadsheet (csv) 744 KB

This file contains the following variables: Measure, Ethnicity, Ethnicity_type, Time, Time_type, Geography, Geography_type, Geography_code, Gender, Age, Value, Value_type, Denominator, Numerator

Publication release date: 13 May 2020

full page history

1. 13 May 2020 Updated with the latest available data (for the 2018 to 2019 school year).

From: Department for Education

Previous editions:

1. 19 September 2019
2. 14 May 2019
3. 5 March 2018

---

Share this page

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn